CS Lewiss Moral Argument and the Existence of a God Essay

CS Lewis’s Moral Argument and the Existence of a God The question of whether or not God exists has been asked by billions of people since the concept of religion emerged. Many people try to explain things such as hurricanes and tornadoes as â€Å"Acts of God† or even the existence of human beings and the world itself to be â€Å"created† by an almighty power. Others claim that the harm they inflict was demanded of them by their God. CS Lewis argues that through the comprehension of standards of good and bad, God’s existence is proven. However, Lewis’s defense for the existence of God is adequate because it fails to acknowledge the possibility for people to be good on their own, without the instruction of a supernatural entity. Clive Staples Lewis†¦show more content†¦The man or woman whose seat was taken tries to make excuses to make it seem as if they were not doing anything that contradicts this unspoken moral standard. Both of the people in this situation seem to have their own moral standards that conflict so they must have this idea in their head of an expectation of morality. They know that morals exist, but we do not know how or where they came from. How does all of this fit into Lewis’s argument for the existence of God? Lewis breaks it down into a three-statement syllogism, which is a method of logical reasoning utilizing deductive reasoning based on two or more statements that are assumed true in order to reach a conclusion in an argument. The first premise states that if God does not exist, then moral values do not exist. Secondly, objective moral values and duties do exist, so therefore, God exists. Objective moralities are those which disagree with universally accepted human pr eferences. If a person agrees with both of the premises, then they reach the given conclusion. But, for a person who is not a theist, they can maintain their nonbelief through